IF I HAD A HAMMER: Thor: Ragnorak, Justice League


For questions: hcasner@aol.com
First, a word from our sponsors: I am now offering a new service: so much emphasis has been given lately to the importance of the opening of your screenplay, I now offer coverage for the first twenty pages at the cost of $20.00.  For those who don’t want to have full coverage on their screenplay at this time, but want to know how well their script is working with the opening pages, this is perfect for you.  I’ll help you not lose the reader on page one. 
 
Ever wonder what a reader for a contest or agency thinks when he reads your screenplay?  Check out my new e-book published on Amazon: Rantings and Ravings of a Screenplay Reader, including my series of essays, What I Learned Reading for Contests This Year, and my film reviews of 2013.  Only $2.99. http://ow.ly/xN31r
 
and check out my Script Consultation Services: http://ow.ly/HPxKE
 
Warning: SPOILERS
When I was young, I tended to not favor DC Comics, but gravitated toward those of the Marvel variety. This is because as a barefoot boy with cheek I never really fit in, was an outsider, so I found the Marvel universe, with its conflicted superheroes and conflicted supervillains, to be more reflective as life as I saw it.
Spiderman was especially someone I could identify with and why Spider-Man: Homecoming is the best Spidey film because it most closely mirrored what my life at school was like.
This approach, which often drives the movies based on Marvel characters, is why I have usually found these films, even the subpar ones, better than the DC ones, with a couple of exceptions (The Dark Knight Rises).
And now next in line is Thor: Ragnorak, which I think is most economically described as simply a ton of fun and perhaps the second best comic book movie of the year (for those keeping score, it’s Logan, then Thor, followed by Wonder Woman, Spider-Man and Guardians of the Galaxy).

 

One of the reasons why Thor: Ragnorak is so successful must be attributed to director Taiko Waititi who brings a lightness of touch and somewhat vicious humor backed by rollicking farce which can also be seen in such films of his as What We Do In The Shadows and Eagle v. Shark, as well as such television series as Flight of the Conchords and The Inbetweeners. (He also is featured in Thor… as the voice of Korg.)

 

It also has a screenplay by Eric Pearson, Craig Kyle and Christopher Yost that refuses to take itself seriously except when it comes to comedy. It’s often blisteringly funny and though the structure may be a bit wobbly (it even depends on two deux ex machinas, both literally and figuratively), and is overcomplicated perhaps at times, the filmmakers have created a story that never bores and the whole thing is rather clever.

 

They even get away with a load of exposition by burying it among speeches that sometimes amount to a stand up comic routine.

 

The plot has something to do with an old legend revolving around the Goddess of Death who is supposed to bring some sort of Gotterdammerung to Thor’s home of Aasgard. But before Thor can save the day, he is captured and sent to a distant location in the universe to take part in gladiator games where he encounters unexpected people he knows, as well as many he doesn’t, and in which various life lessons are learned and character arcs are fulfilled.

 

As Thor, Chris Hemsworth is especially adept at all this tomfoolery. Too good looking to be taken seriously in dramatic roles, he works much better in characters where he is in many ways mocking his persona (this was also true of Christopher Reeve and why his Superman was such a good time).

 

The film also has such pleasures as Jeff Goldblum doing his best Jeff Goldblum impression in some time and Rachel House as his yeoman (and perhaps Waititi’s second best contribution to the film).

 

The movie has the usual suspects in the supporting roles, plus a few surprises along the way, as well as Cate Blanchett as the Goddess of Death.

 

And now we have Justice League, perhaps a film that defines DC movies. It’s filled with flat and uninteresting superheroes and is not much more successful with the supervillains; has a not completely boring, but not completely interesting plot; and is burdened with a not that impressive bit of directing.

 

In almost every area, they do everything wrong that Marvel does right, almost as if on purpose, but comes across more as if no one involved has a clue as to what makes Marvel work. The only exception is Ezra Miller’s Flash and the only time the movie really comes alive is when he is on the screen-and perhaps coincidently, his is the most Marvel-like character in the bunch.

 

The movie even has a fight between Superman and the other Justice Leagers that completely stops the movie dead, just dead, and only made me think of the fight among superheroes in Captain America: Civil War that was witty, clever and exciting.

 

The plot revolves around some rigamarole with three boxes that if obtained by the bad guys will be used to bring about Armageddon (even that word doesn’t quite sound as interesting as Gotterdammerung). It all ends pretty much as you expect it to, but not nearly as quickly as you might wish.

 

With Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman, Henry Cahill as Superman, Ben Affleck as Batman, Jason Mamoa as Aquaman, and Ray Fisher as Cyborg. Jeremy Irons plays Michael Caine and though I love Irons as an actor, no one does Caine better than Caine.

 

Directed by Zach Snyder and written by Chris Terrie and Josh Whedon.

Advertisements

2 Comments

  1. In a world…(See what I’m doing there?) where anything is digitally possible, wonder and amazement are diminished. Which is why I can be impressed by CGI grandiosities but never blown away by them. I went to Thor on the basis of your review and the fact that I’ve had fun with Chris Pratt’s Guardians of the Galaxy efforts.Thor, however, with or without his hammer doesn’t have the strength to free himself from this mediocre muck. Tongues driving holes through cheeks are no substitute for an effective narrative. This film can factually be said to have a start and a finish, but that’s not the same as a beginning and end. It’s is one long middle with a flatline terrain where the arcs ought to be. Even Jeff Goldblum cannot be delicious enough to overshadow a tedious string of mind-numbingly similar and equally frenetic firestorms that culminates in a no-greater final battle. And while I’m all for silliness, willful suspension, and the elastic physics of fantasy, precisely which modes of death do and do not imperil these allegedly mortal gods? When prolonged multi-dimensional body-slamming apparently renders little beyond a possible concussion, why should a sword blade be capable of more than a scratch? At least give me a hint of when I should fear for the hero’s well-being. I’ll say I didn’t begrudge the price of admission, but I was less underwhelmed by Ant-Man.

So tell me what you think.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s